CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 |
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY. |
|
|
|
Protection in form of tariff and free trade have |
long been |
argued |
in |
|
economic theory and economic history. However , it is possible |
to say |
that |
||
the |
precise relationship between trade barriers in form |
of tariff or free trade |
in the long run economic growth remains a difficult theoretical issue that is
being explored in a variety of ways.
Simithian and Ricardian conclusion reinforced by the Hercscher-ohlin theorem
recommend free trade |
as the best |
commercial partners. This doctrine |
that |
is |
|||||||||
focused on improvement in the level of income is based on |
static |
||||||||||||
framework that may limit the interpretation of the long run effect. |
|
|
|
||||||||||
Relationship |
between |
economic |
growth |
and tariffs |
depends |
mostly |
on the |
||||||
characteristics |
of |
a |
country. Tariff can |
benefit |
a |
country |
depending on |
||||||
whether it is |
developed or |
developing |
or |
developed (a developed |
one |
seems |
|||||||
to lose) either big or |
small |
country and |
whether it |
has |
comparative |
advantage |
|||||||
in sector receiving protection. Tariffs are imposed on imported goods and |
are |
||||||||||||
used to refer |
to |
schedule |
of duties applicable to a list of commodities |
as |
the |
||||||||
commodities imported or exported. These taxes could be assessed either as a percentage of volume of the commodity concerned (ad valorem), or on the
of |
some |
physical |
features |
as |
: |
weight, |
length, |
an specific |
||
gravity.(Johnson,1971). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Tariffs rates vary according to the type of goods imported. |
Import |
tariffs |
will |
|||||||
increase the cost of importers |
and increase |
the |
price of imported goods in |
|||||||
the local markets, thus lowering |
the quantity of goods imported. Tariffs |
may |
||||||||
be imposed on export, and in |
an economy with floating exchange rates, |
|||||||||
export tariffs have similar effect as import tariffs .However, since export |
are |
|||||||||
often |
perceived as |
„?hurting?? |
local |
industries |
while |
import |
tariffs |
are |
perceived as helping local industries, export tariffs are seldom implemented (Meier,2000)
Protectionists believe that infant industries must be protected in order to allow them growth to a point where they can fairly compete with the larger matured industries established in foreign countries. They believe that without tariffs, infant industries will die before they reach a size of economies of scale, industrial infrastructure, and skill in manufacturing have progressed sufficiently to allow the industry to compete in the global market. They argue that government have a responsibility to protect their corporations through tariffs as well as their when putting its companies at a competitive disadvantage by enacting laws for social goods .They believe that these law
companies and |
ultimately hurting |
the |
citizens, |
|
but these laws were designed |
to protect. |
|
|
|
Tariffs is always seen as a redress to social |
and economic costs |
of |
trade or |
as a way of enhancing economic advantages. However, in most cases
economists, argue that |
erecting barriers on trade |
impose costs |
in the |
economy that exceeds |
the benefit gotten. These |
costs can rise |
from |
insufficient resource allocation, intractable implementation and foreign
retaliation.The precise relationship between tariffs and economic growth has
long remained a difficult theoretical issue that is being explored in variety of
ways. The question often asked by international and development
economists, as well as their supporters is that which one lead to a faster economic growth, is free trade or protected trade?, economists are still in search for the acceptable answer to this question.
Tariffs |
can be used |
to |
protect |
infant |
industries |
and this tariff has its |
|||
problem |
it |
creates. High |
tariff and |
other |
forms of |
trade |
barriers |
have been |
|
regarded |
as |
impediments |
to |
economic growth. The |
use |
of tariffs |
to protect |
and to stimulate the production of the import substitution in Nigeria has obvious problem. By protectingthese industries, inefficiency may be encouraged.
tariffs and other forms have burdened consumers with high price and |
|
have |
shielded producers from international competition. However a safe |
guard |
against frequent tariff changes and high tariff rates between 1995 to |
2005. |
Nigeria?s tariffs policy has faced great challenges of cumbersome and |
lengthy imports procedures, frequent change in tariff. High duties on
consumer goods widen the gap between applied and bound rate with their
associated negative impact on the economy. |
|
The Nigeria government can make adequate and |
reliable tariff policies, |
and also encourage this infant industries to produce |
those goods that tariff |
has been impose on; the quality of this goods should match those formally imported. This study should be able to expose how the tariff imposed and the structure of this tariff, can make an impact on the economic growth of Nigeria and how this can improve the economy as a whole.
The objective of the study are as follows below;
1. |
To determine the |
nature of the relationship that exist between tariffs |
and |
economic growth in |
Nigeria. |
Nigeria?s economy for the period 1980 to 2013.
The working hypothesis for this study is as follow;
1. |
– Hi: There is no |
significant relationship between tariffs and growth, thus |
|
it has not caused |
any economic growth in Nigeria. |
This study will be relevant to the Nigeria society in the following ways;
Usually, tariff are in form of excise duties, import tariff and export tariff. inadequate complete reliable data, as data collected from some economic journals and textbooks vary from each other. Time is another limitation encountered by the research.
Accounting/ Audit/ Finance Jobs
Administration/ Office/ Operations Jobs
Advertising/ Social Media Jobs